Skip to apologetics
LogosPharosScripture & Sacred Tradition New Chat Sign in
All sections

Eastern Orthodox apologetics

Apologetics reference desk

Find a concise Orthodox answer, examine the source in context, and copy a citation for your discussion.

12 topics · English

God and Christ · Conciliar doctrine

Topic link

The Trinity is not three gods

Objection: If the Father, Son and Spirit are distinct, why are they not three gods?

Orthodoxy confesses one undivided divine essence in three distinct Persons: Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The distinction is personal, not a division into three beings with separate divine natures or competing wills. Neither are the Persons temporary roles of a single Person. Begin by distinguishing person from nature rather than using an analogy that silently changes the confession.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

One essence does not mean one Person. Three Persons does not mean three independent gods.

Scripture in context

Matthew 28:18–20 · King James Version

18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.

19 ¶ Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:

20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint John of Damascus · An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.
Concerning the Holy Trinity.
one essence, one divinity, one power, one will, one energy, one beginning, one authority, one dominion, one sovereignty, made known in three perfect subsistences and adored with one adoration, believed in and ministered to by all rational creation, united without confusion and divided without separation (which indeed transcends thought).

S. D. F. Salmond, translator of John of Damascus · NPNF2-09. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1899

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

We believe, then, in One God, one beginning, having no beginning, uncreate, unbegotten, imperishable and immortal, everlasting, infinite, uncircumscribed, boundless, of infinite power, simple, uncompound, incorporeal, without flux, passionless, unchangeable, unalterable, unseen, the fountain of goodness and justice, the light of the mind, inaccessible; a power known by no measure, measurable only by His own will alone (for all things that He wills He can), creator of all created things, seen or unseen, of all the maintainer and preserver, for all the provider, master and lord and king over all, with an endless and immortal kingdom: having no contrary, filling all, by nothing encompassed, but rather Himself the encompasser and maintainer and original possessor of the universe, occupying all essences intact and extending beyond all things, and being separate from all essence as being super-essential and above all things and absolute God, absolute goodness, and absolute fulness: determining all sovereignties and ranks, being placed above all sovereignty and rank, above essence and life and word and thought: being Himself very light and goodness and life and essence, inasmuch as He does not derive His being from another, that is to say, of those things that exist: but being Himself the fountain of being to all that is, of life to the living, of reason to those that have reason; to all the cause of all good: perceiving all things even before they have become: one essence, one divinity, one power, one will, one energy, one beginning, one authority, one dominion, one sovereignty, made known in three perfect subsistences and adored with one adoration, believed in and ministered to by all rational creation, united without confusion and divided without separation (which indeed transcends thought). (We believe) in Father and Son and Holy Spirit whereinto also we have been baptized. For so our Lord commanded the Apostles to baptize, saying, Baptizing them in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.

Do not overclaim

No physical analogy explains divine life exactly. John of Damascus is a later patristic expositor, not an eyewitness to Nicaea.

Clarifying question

Are you objecting to three independent gods, or to personal distinction within the one divine nature?

Further primary texts

God and Christ · Conciliar doctrine

Topic link

The Son is begotten, not created

Objection: Does calling Jesus the Son mean that He began to exist?

The Son is eternally begotten of the Father, not made out of nothing. His generation is not a bodily event or a moment before which the Father lacked a Son. John 1 places the Word with God and confesses Him as God, while distinguishing everything made through Him. Christ’s genuine human growth and obedience in the incarnation do not turn His divine nature into a creature.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

Eternal generation concerns the Son’s origin from the Father; creation concerns what God brings into being by His will.

Scripture in context

John 1:1–3 · King James Version

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

2 The same was in the beginning with God.

3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint John of Damascus · An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.
Concerning the Holy Trinity.
For there never was a time when the Father was and the Son was not, but always the Father and always the Son, Who was begotten of Him, existed together.

S. D. F. Salmond, translator of John of Damascus · NPNF2-09. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1899

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

(We believe) in one Father, the beginning, and cause of all: begotten of no one: without cause or generation, alone subsisting: creator of all: but Father of one only by nature, His Only-begotten Son and our Lord and God and Saviour Jesus Christ, and Producer of the most Holy Spirit. And in one Son of God, the Only-begotten, our Lord, Jesus Christ: begotten of the Father, before all the ages: Light of Light, true God of true God: begotten, not made, consubstantial with the Father, through Whom all things are made: and when we say He was before all the ages we shew that His birth is without time or beginning: for the Son of God was not brought into being out of nothing, He that is the effulgence of the glory, the impress of the Father’s subsistence, the living wisdom and power, the Word possessing interior subsistence, the essential and perfect and living image of the unseen God. But always He was with the Father and in Him, everlastingly and without beginning begotten of Him. For there never was a time when the Father was and the Son was not, but always the Father and always the Son, Who was begotten of Him, existed together. For He could not have received the name Father apart from the Son: for if He were without the Son, He could not be the Father: and if He thereafter had the Son, thereafter He became the Father, not having been the Father prior to this, and He was changed from that which was not the Father and became the Father. This is the worst form of blasphemy. For we may not speak of God as destitute of natural generative power: and generative power means, the power of producing from one’s self, that is to say, from one’s own proper essence, that which is like in nature to one’s self.

Do not overclaim

Do not attribute every word of the fuller liturgical Creed to the text of Nicaea in 325. Distinguish divine generation from Christ’s human birth.

Clarifying question

Does the text place the Word among things made, or identify Him as the one through whom all made things came to be?

Further primary texts

God and Christ · Conciliar doctrine

Topic link

One Christ, fully God and fully man

Objection: Do two natures make Jesus two persons?

The one eternal Son truly becomes man, retaining full divinity and assuming complete humanity. The distinction of natures is not a division into two personal subjects, and their union does not dissolve humanity into divinity. Chalcedon’s safeguards must be held together: without confusion, change, division or separation.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

Nature answers what Christ is; Person identifies who He is. The same Son is divine and human.

Scripture in context

John 1:14–18 · King James Version

14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

15 ¶ John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.

16 And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.

17 For the law was given by Moses, [but] grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.

18 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared [him.]

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint John of Damascus · An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.
Concerning Christ's two natures, in opposition to those who hold that He has only one.
For we confess that He alike in His divinity and in His humanity both is and is said to be perfect God, the same Being, and that He consists of two natures, and exists in two natures.

S. D. F. Salmond, translator of John of Damascus · NPNF2-09. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1899

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

We, however, do not give it as our view that Christ’s nature is compound, nor yet that He is one thing made of other things and differing from them as man is made of soul and body, or as the body is made of the four elements, but hold that, though He is constituted of these different parts He is yet the same. For we confess that He alike in His divinity and in His humanity both is and is said to be perfect God, the same Being, and that He consists of two natures, and exists in two natures. Further, by the word “Christ” we understand the name of the subsistence, not in the sense of one kind, but as signifying the existence of two natures. For in His own person He anointed Himself; as God anointing His body with His own divinity, and as Man being anointed. For He is Himself both God and Man. And the anointing is the divinity of His humanity. For if Christ, being of one compound nature, is of like essence to the Father, then the Father also must be compound and of like essence with the flesh, which is absurd and extremely blasphemous.

Do not overclaim

Do not identify every use of Cyril’s one-incarnate-nature language with Eutychian confusion, or every contemporary Oriental Orthodox Christian with Eutyches.

Clarifying question

Which is being counted: the natures that remain distinct, or the Person who lives and acts in both?

Further primary texts

God and Christ · Conciliar doctrine

Topic link

Christ’s human will is real

Objection: Does Christ’s prayer in Gethsemane imply two competing Christs?

The one incarnate Son wills and acts according to both His divine and human natures. His human will is neither abolished nor sinfully opposed to the divine. Real human shrinking before death is not itself rebellion. His obedience is genuinely human and freely embraced; personal unity does not require an incomplete humanity.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

Two natural wills are not two personal subjects. The divine will is common to the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Scripture in context

Matthew 26:36–46 · King James Version

36 ¶ Then cometh Jesus with them unto a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto the disciples, Sit ye here, while I go and pray yonder.

37 And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and very heavy.

38 Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrowful, even unto death: tarry ye here, and watch with me.

39 And he went a little further, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou [wilt].

40 And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them asleep, and saith unto Peter, What, could ye not watch with me one hour?

41 Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation: the spirit indeed [is] willing, but the flesh [is] weak.

42 He went away again the second time, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done.

43 And he came and found them asleep again: for their eyes were heavy.

44 And he left them, and went away again, and prayed the third time, saying the same words.

45 Then cometh he to his disciples, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest: behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man is betrayed into the hands of sinners.

46 Rise, let us be going: behold, he is at hand that doth betray me.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint John of Damascus · An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.
Concerning the volitions and free-will of our Lord Jesus Christ.
Since, then, Christ has two natures, we hold that He has also two natural wills and two natural energies.

S. D. F. Salmond, translator of John of Damascus · NPNF2-09. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1899

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

Since, then, Christ has two natures, we hold that He has also two natural wills and two natural energies. But since His two natures have one subsistence, we hold that it is one and the same person who wills and energises naturally in both natures, of which, and in which, and also which is Christ our Lord: and moreover that He wills and energises without separation but as a united whole. For He wills and energises in either form in close communion with the other. For things that have the same essence have also the same will and energy, while things that are different in essence are different in will and energy; and vice versa, things that have the same will and energy have the same essence, while things that are different in will and energy are different in essence.

Do not overclaim

Natural operation is a theological term, not a measurement of physical energy. Freedom need not include a sinful choice to be genuine.

Clarifying question

Would removing human willing preserve Christ’s complete humanity, or remove something essential from it?

Further primary texts

God and Christ · Conciliar doctrine

Topic link

Theotokos identifies the incarnate Son

Objection: Does Mother of God mean that Mary created God or existed before Him?

No. The title identifies the Person whom Mary bore according to His humanity: the eternal Son Himself, not a separate human person alongside Him. Mary does not originate the divine essence. The Son’s eternal generation from the Father and His human birth from Mary are distinct, while the one born is the same Person.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

Motherhood concerns the Person born, not the production of His divine nature.

Scripture in context

Luke 1:39–45 · King James Version

39 And Mary arose in those days, and went into the hill country with haste, into a city of Juda;

40 And entered into the house of Zacharias, and saluted Elisabeth.

41 And it came to pass, that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost:

42 And she spake out with a loud voice, and said, Blessed [art] thou among women, and blessed [is] the fruit of thy womb.

43 And whence [is] this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?

44 For, lo, as soon as the voice of thy salutation sounded in mine ears, the babe leaped in my womb for joy.

45 And blessed [is] she that believed: for there shall be a performance of those things which were told her from the Lord.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint John of Damascus · An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.
That the holy Virgin is the Mother of God: an argument directed against the Nestorians.
For we hold that God was born of her, not implying that the divinity of the Word received from her the beginning of its being, but meaning that God the Word Himself, Who was begotten of the Father timelessly before the ages, and was with the Father and the Spirit without beginning and through eternity, took up His abode in these last days for the sake of our salvation in the Virgin’s womb, and was without change made flesh and born of her.

S. D. F. Salmond, translator of John of Damascus · NPNF2-09. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1899

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

Moreover we proclaim the holy Virgin to be in strict truth the Mother of God. For inasmuch as He who was born of her was true God, she who bare the true God incarnate is the true mother of God. For we hold that God was born of her, not implying that the divinity of the Word received from her the beginning of its being, but meaning that God the Word Himself, Who was begotten of the Father timelessly before the ages, and was with the Father and the Spirit without beginning and through eternity, took up His abode in these last days for the sake of our salvation in the Virgin’s womb, and was without change made flesh and born of her. For the holy Virgin did not bare mere man but true God: and not mere God but God incarnate, Who did not bring down His body from Heaven, nor simply passed through the Virgin as channel, but received from her flesh of like essence to our own and subsisting in Himself. For if the body had come down from heaven and had not partaken of our nature, what would have been the use of His becoming man? For the purpose of God the Word becoming man was that the very same nature, which had sinned and fallen and become corrupted, should triumph over the deceiving tyrant and so be freed from corruption, just as the divine apostle puts it, For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. If the first is true the second must also be true.

Do not overclaim

This argument does not by itself establish every later claim about Mary. Do not present a conclusion about Christ’s personal unity as a complete argument for every Marian devotion.

Clarifying question

Who was born of Mary: the Word truly made man, or a separate human subject joined to Him?

Further primary texts

Worship and saints · Conciliar doctrine

Topic link

Veneration is not worship of an object

Objection: Does bowing before an icon violate the prohibition of idols?

The Orthodox distinction concerns the recipient and kind of honor, not merely the outward movement. Worship belongs to God alone; honor shown through an icon refers to the person represented. Christ can be depicted according to the humanity in which He truly became visible. An icon does not depict or circumscribe the divine essence, and wood and pigment are not deities.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

An image is not its prototype. Veneration and divine worship are not interchangeable even when an older translation uses worship broadly.

Scripture in context

John 1:14 · King James Version

14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint John of Damascus · An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.
Concerning Images.
For as Basil, that much-versed expounder of divine things, says, the honour given to the image passes over to the prototype.

S. D. F. Salmond, translator of John of Damascus · NPNF2-09. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1899

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

But since some find fault with us for worshipping and honouring the image of our Saviour and that of our Lady, and those, too, of the rest of the saints and servants of Christ, let them remember that in the beginning God created man after His own image. On what grounds, then, do we shew reverence to each other unless because we are made after God’s image? For as Basil, that much-versed expounder of divine things, says, the honour given to the image passes over to the prototype. Now a prototype is that which is imaged, from which the derivative is obtained. Why was it that the Mosaic people honoured on all hands the tabernacle which bore an image and type of heavenly things, or rather of the whole creation? God indeed said to Moses, Look that thou make them after their pattern which was shewed thee in the mount. The Cherubim, too, which o’ershadow the mercy seat, are they not the work of men’s hands? What, further, is the celebrated temple at Jerusalem? Is it not hand-made and fashioned by the skill of men?

Do not overclaim

The argument for icons rests on the incarnation and the Church’s teaching, not on an image legend. Exodus 25 shows commanded sacred imagery, but does not alone settle the whole question of Christian veneration.

Clarifying question

Is every sacred image an idol, or is the objection to giving a creature the worship belonging to God?

Further primary texts

Worship and saints · Received Church teaching

Topic link

The saints do not replace Christ

Objection: Does asking saints to pray compete with Christ’s unique mediation?

Christ alone reconciles humanity to God through His incarnation, Cross and resurrection. Asking another member of His Body for intercession does not posit another redeemer. Orthodox honor of the saints concerns what God has done in them, not independent divine power belonging to creatures. Their life and prayer depend upon God.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

Participation by grace is not possession of the divine essence. Intercession is not an alternative atonement.

Scripture in context

1 Timothy 2:1–6 · King James Version

1 I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, [and] giving of thanks, be made for all men;

2 For kings, and [for] all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty.

3 For this [is] good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;

4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.

5 For [there is] one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus;

6 Who gave himself a ransom for all, to be testified in due time.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint John of Damascus · An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.
Concerning the honour due to the Saints and their remains.
To the saints honour must be paid as friends of Christ, as sons and heirs of God:

S. D. F. Salmond, translator of John of Damascus · NPNF2-09. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1899

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

To the saints honour must be paid as friends of Christ, as sons and heirs of God: in the words of John the theologian and evangelist, As many as received Him, to them gave He power to became sons of God. So that they are no longer servants, but sons: and if sons, also heirs, heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ: and the Lord in the holy Gospels says to His apostles, Ye are My friends. Henceforth I call you not servants, for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth. And further, if the Creator and Lord of all things is called also King of Kings and Lord of Lords and God of Gods, surely also the saints are gods and lords and kings. For of these God is and is called God and Lord and King. For I am the God of Abraham, He said to Moses, the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. And God made Moses a god to Pharaoh. Now I mean gods and kings and lords not in nature, but as rulers and masters of their passions, and as preserving a truthful likeness to the divine image according to which they were made (for the image of a king is also called king), and as being united to God of their own free-will and receiving Him as an indweller and becoming by grace through participation with Him what He is Himself by nature. Surely, then, the worshippers and friends and sons of God are to be held in honour? For the honour shewn to the most thoughtful of fellow-servants is a proof of good feeling towards the common Master.

Saint John of Damascus · An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.
Concerning the honour due to the Saints and their remains.
Are not those, then, worthy of honour who are the patrons of the whole race, and make intercession to God for us?

S. D. F. Salmond, translator of John of Damascus · NPNF2-09. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1899

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

In the law every one who toucheth a dead body was considered impure, but these are not dead. For from the time when He that is Himself life and the Author of life was reckoned among the dead, we do not call those dead who have fallen asleep in the hope of the resurrection and in faith on Him. For how could a dead body work miracles? How, therefore, are demons driven off by them, diseases dispelled, sick persons made well, the blind restored to sight, lepers purified, temptations and troubles overcome, and how does every good gift from the Father of lights come down through them to those who pray with sure faith? How much labour would you not undergo to find a patron to introduce you to a mortal king and speak to him on your behalf? Are not those, then, worthy of honour who are the patrons of the whole race, and make intercession to God for us? Yea, verily, we ought to give honour to them by raising temples to God in their name, bringing them fruit-offerings, honouring their memories and taking spiritual delight in them, in order that the joy of those who call on us may be ours, that in our attempts at worship we may not on the contrary cause them offence. For those who worship God will take pleasure in those things whereby God is worshipped, while His shield-bearers will be wrath at those things wherewith God is wroth. In psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, in contrition and in pity for the needy, let us believers worship the saints, as God also is most worshipped in such wise. Let us raise monuments to them and visible images, and let us ourselves become, through imitation of their virtues, living monuments and images of them. Let us give honour to her who bore God as being strictly and truly the Mother of God. Let us honour also the prophet John as forerunner and baptist, as apostle and martyr, For among them that are born of women there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist, as saith the Lord, and he became the first to proclaim the Kingdom. Let us honour the apostles as the Lord’s brothers, who saw Him face to face and ministered to His passion, for whom God the Father did foreknow He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son, first apostles, second prophets, third pastors and teachers. Let us also honour the martyrs of the Lord chosen out of every class, as soldiers of Christ who have drunk His cup and were then baptized with the baptism of His life-bringing death, to be partakers of His passion and glory: of whom the leader is Stephen, the first deacon of Christ and apostle and first martyr. Also let us honour our holy fathers, the God-possessed ascetics, whose struggle was the longer and more toilsome one of the conscience: who wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins, being destitute, afflicted, tormented; they wandered in deserts and in mountains and in dens and caves of the earth, of whom the world was not worthy. Let us honour those who were prophets before grace, the patriarchs and just men who foretold the Lord’s coming. Let us carefully review the life of these men, and let us emulate their faith and love and hope and zeal and way of life, and endurance of sufferings and patience even to blood, in order that we may be sharers with them in their crowns of glory.

Do not overclaim

First Timothy 2 contains both the call to intercession and Christ’s unique mediation. That compatibility is not, by itself, a full demonstration that departed saints hear petitions. Do not invent a mechanism of omniscience for creatures.

Clarifying question

Is your objection to all intercession, or specifically to prayer involving those who have departed in Christ?

Sacraments and salvation · Received Church teaching

Topic link

The Eucharist is not ordinary bread and drink

Objection: Is a real Eucharistic participation a late invention?

Justin Martyr’s First Apology 66 is an early Christian witness that the Eucharist is received as Christ’s flesh and blood, not common food. Orthodox teaching confesses a real gift of His Body and Blood through the Holy Spirit, not a merely mental recollection. Historical testimony should be read alongside the apostolic account of the supper and communion.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

A sacramental sign need not be an empty sign. Mystery does not mean that the gift is unreal.

Scripture in context

1 Corinthians 10:16–17 · King James Version

16 The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?

17 For we [being] many are one bread, [and] one body: for we are all partakers of that one bread.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint Justin Martyr · The First Apology
Chapter LXVI.—Of the Eucharist.
For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh.

Marcus Dods and George Reith · ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1885

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

And this food is called among us Εὐχαριστία [the Eucharist], of which no one is allowed to partake but the man who believes that the things which we teach are true, and who has been washed with the washing that is for the remission of sins, and unto regeneration, and who is so living as Christ has enjoined. For not as common bread and common drink do we receive these; but in like manner as Jesus Christ our Saviour, having been made flesh by the Word of God, had both flesh and blood for our salvation, so likewise have we been taught that the food which is blessed by the prayer of His word, and from which our blood and flesh by transmutation are nourished, is the flesh and blood of that Jesus who was made flesh. For the apostles, in the memoirs composed by them, which are called Gospels, have thus delivered unto us what was enjoined upon them; that Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, said, “This do ye in remembrance of Me, this is My body;” and that, after the same manner, having taken the cup and given thanks, He said, “This is My blood;” and gave it to them alone. Which the wicked devils have imitated in the mysteries of Mithras, commanding the same thing to be done. For, that bread and a cup of water are placed with certain incantations in the mystic rites of one who is being initiated, you either know or can learn.

Do not overclaim

Justin is a second-century witness, not an apostle or a complete account of every later technical formulation. His text alone does not settle every debate about the manner of the change.

Clarifying question

How does your account explain both the early witness and Paul’s language of communion in Christ’s Body and Blood?

Sacraments and salvation · Received Church teaching

Topic link

Baptism is more than a public declaration

Objection: Is baptism merely an outward testimony to an already complete event?

The Orthodox Church confesses baptism for the remission of sins and new life in Christ. Romans 6 presents baptism as participation in Christ’s death and resurrection, not merely a human announcement. Faith, repentance and a life turned toward God are not made irrelevant by the sacrament.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

God’s gift is not a human achievement, and sacramental efficacy is not permission for an unchanged sinful life.

Scripture in context

Romans 6:3–6 · King James Version

3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?

4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.

5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also [in the likeness] of [his] resurrection:

6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with [him], that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint John of Damascus · An Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith.
Concerning Faith and Baptism.
We confess one baptism for the remission of sins and for life eternal.

S. D. F. Salmond, translator of John of Damascus · NPNF2-09. Hilary of Poitiers, John of Damascus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1899

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

We confess one baptism for the remission of sins and for life eternal. For baptism declares the Lord’s death. We are indeed “buried with the Lord through baptism,” as saith the divine Apostle. So then, as our Lord died once for all, we also must be baptized once for all, and baptized according to the Word of the Lord, In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, being taught the confession in Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Those, then, who, after having been baptized into Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, and having been taught that there is one divine nature in three subsistences, are rebaptized, these, as the divine Apostle says, crucify the Christ afresh. For it is impossible, he saith, for those who were once enlightened, &c., to renew them again unto repentance: seeing they crucify to themselves the Christ afresh, and put Him to an open shame. But those who were not baptized into the Holy Trinity, these must be baptized again. For although the divine Apostle says: Into Christ and into His death were we baptized, he does not mean that the invocation of baptism must be in these words, but that baptism is an image of the death of Christ. For by the three immersions, baptism signifies the three days of our Lord’s entombment. The baptism then into Christ means that believers are baptized into Him. We could not believe in Christ if we were not taught confession in Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. For Christ is the Son of the Living God, Whom the Father anointed with the Holy Spirit: in the words of the divine David, Therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows. And Isaiah also speaking in the person of the Lord says, The Spirit of the Lord is upon me because He hath anointed me. Christ, however, taught His own disciples the invocation and said, Baptizing them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. For since Christ made us for incorruption , and we transgressed His saving command, He condemned us to the corruption of death in order that that which is evil should not be immortal, and when in His compassion He stooped to His servants and became like us, He redeemed us from corruption through His own passion. He caused the fountain of remission to well forth for us out of His holy and immaculate side, water for our regeneration, and the washing away of sin and corruption; and blood to drink as the hostage of life eternal. And He laid on us the command to be born again of water and of the Spirit, through prayer and invocation, the Holy Spirit drawing nigh unto the water. For since man’s nature is twofold, consisting of soul and body, He bestowed on us a twofold purification, of water and of the Spirit: the Spirit renewing that part in us which is after His image and likeness, and the water by the grace of the Spirit cleansing the body from sin and delivering it from corruption, the water indeed expressing the image of death, but the Spirit affording the earnest of life.

Do not overclaim

This passage is not a complete ruling on the reception of every non-Orthodox baptism. Jurisdictional practice and individual sacramental questions require the bishop’s guidance.

Clarifying question

Does Paul describe only our testimony about Christ, or a real participation in His death and risen life?

Scripture and Church · Received Church teaching

Topic link

Apostolic Tradition is not every inherited custom

Objection: Does tradition mean adding human inventions to Scripture?

Orthodoxy receives Scripture within the apostolic life of the Church, not as a rival to it. Paul commands fidelity to what the apostles taught both orally and by letter. Basil’s account of unwritten practices witnesses to the Church’s received worship. A claim to be traditional must still be examined; age, popularity or a private custom alone does not make something apostolic.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

Apostolic Tradition is not identical with every local habit. Scripture and the Church’s received faith are not competing revelations.

Scripture in context

2 Thessalonians 2:15 · King James Version

15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint Basil the Great · De Spiritu Sancto.
Of the origin of the word “with,” and what force it has. Also concerning the unwritten laws of the church.
Of the beliefs and practices whether generally accepted or publicly enjoined which are preserved in the Church some we possess derived from written teaching; others we have received delivered to us “in a mystery” by the tradition of the apostles; and both of these in relation to true religion have the same force.

Blomfield Jackson, translator · NPNF2-08. Basil: Letters and Select Works · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1895

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

66. Of the beliefs and practices whether generally accepted or publicly enjoined which are preserved in the Church some we possess derived from written teaching; others we have received delivered to us “in a mystery” by the tradition of the apostles; and both of these in relation to true religion have the same force. And these no one will gainsay;—no one, at all events, who is even moderately versed in the institutions of the Church. For were we to attempt to reject such customs as have no written authority, on the ground that the importance they possess is small, we should unintentionally injure the Gospel in its very vitals; or, rather, should make our public definition a mere phrase and nothing more. For instance, to take the first and most general example, who is thence who has taught us in writing to sign with the sign of the cross those who have trusted in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ? What writing has taught us to turn to the East at the prayer? Which of the saints has left us in writing the words of the invocation at the displaying of the bread of the Eucharist and the cup of blessing? For we are not, as is well known, content with what the apostle or the Gospel has recorded, but both in preface and conclusion we add other words as being of great importance to the validity of the ministry, and these we derive from unwritten teaching. Moreover we bless the water of baptism and the oil of the chrism, and besides this the catechumen who is being baptized. On what written authority do we do this? Is not our authority silent and mystical tradition? Nay, by what written word is the anointing of oil itself taught? And whence comes the custom of baptizing thrice? And as to the other customs of baptism from what Scripture do we derive the renunciation of Satan and his angels? Does not this come from that unpublished and secret teaching which our fathers guarded in a silence out of the reach of curious meddling and inquisitive investigation? Well had they learnt the lesson that the awful dignity of the mysteries is best preserved by silence. What the uninitiated are not even allowed to look at was hardly likely to be publicly paraded about in written documents. What was the meaning of the mighty Moses in not making all the parts of the tabernacle open to every one? The profane he stationed without the sacred barriers; the first courts he conceded to the purer; the Levites alone he judged worthy of being servants of the Deity; sacrifices and burnt offerings and the rest of the priestly functions he allotted to the priests; one chosen out of all he admitted to the shrine, and even this one not always but on only one day in the year, and of this one day a time was fixed for his entry so that he might gaze on the Holy of Holies amazed at the strangeness and novelty of the sight. Moses was wise enough to know that contempt stretches to the trite and to the obvious, while a keen interest is naturally associated with the unusual and the unfamiliar. In the same manner the Apostles and Fathers who laid down laws for the Church from the beginning thus guarded the awful dignity of the mysteries in secrecy and silence, for what is bruited abroad random among the common folk is no mystery at all. This is the reason for our tradition of unwritten precepts and practices, that the knowledge of our dogmas may not become neglected and contemned by the multitude through familiarity. “Dogma” and “Kerugma” are two distinct things; the former is observed in silence; the latter is proclaimed to all the world. One form of this silence is the obscurity employed in Scripture, which makes the meaning of “dogmas” difficult to be understood for the very advantage of the reader: Thus we all look to the East at our prayers, but few of us know that we are seeking our own old country, Paradise, which God planted in Eden in the East. We pray standing, on the first day of the week, but we do not all know the reason. On the day of the resurrection (or “standing again” Grk. ἀνάστασις) we remind ourselves of the grace given to us by standing at prayer, not only because we rose with Christ, and are bound to “seek those things which are above,” but because the day seems to us to be in some sense an image of the age which we expect, wherefore, though it is the beginning of days, it is not called by Moses first, but one. For he says “There was evening, and there was morning, one day,” as though the same day often recurred. Now “one” and “eighth” are the same, in itself distinctly indicating that really “one” and “eighth” of which the Psalmist makes mention in certain titles of the Psalms, the state which follows after this present time, the day which knows no waning or eventide, and no successor, that age which endeth not or groweth old. Of necessity, then, the church teaches her own foster children to offer their prayers on that day standing, to the end that through continual reminder of the endless life we may not neglect to make provision for our removal thither. Moreover all Pentecost is a reminder of the resurrection expected in the age to come. For that one and first day, if seven times multiplied by seven, completes the seven weeks of the holy Pentecost; for, beginning at the first, Pentecost ends with the same, making fifty revolutions through the like intervening days. And so it is a likeness of eternity, beginning as it does and ending, as in a circling course, at the same point. On this day the rules of the church have educated us to prefer the upright attitude of prayer, for by their plain reminder they, as it were, make our mind to dwell no longer in the present but in the future. Moreover every time we fall upon our knees and rise from off them we shew by the very deed that by our sin we fell down to earth, and by the loving kindness of our Creator were called back to heaven.

Do not overclaim

Basil’s examples concern particular beliefs and practices. His authority is not a blank check to call any later custom obligatory or to avoid examining historical evidence.

Clarifying question

Are you rejecting traditions contrary to God’s word, or also the apostolic teaching Paul explicitly commands Christians to hold?

Scripture and Church · Patristic historical witness

Topic link

Apostolic succession includes the apostolic faith

Objection: Is apostolic succession merely a later claim of institutional authority?

Irenaeus argues against secret teachings by appealing to the public apostolic tradition and the succession of bishops in the churches. His argument joins public continuity with the content of the faith handed down. A list of ordinations detached from that faith does not reproduce his whole argument.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

Historical succession and fidelity to apostolic teaching belong together; a bare institutional claim does not settle every ecclesiological question.

Scripture in context

2 Timothy 2:1–2 · King James Version

1 Thou therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus.

2 And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint Irenaeus of Lyons · Against Heresies: Book III
Chapter III.—A refutation of the...: Chapter III.—A refutation of the heretics, from the fact that, in the various Churches, a perpetual succession of bishops was kept up.
It is within the power of all, therefore, in every Church, who may wish to see the truth, to contemplate clearly the tradition of the apostles manifested throughout the whole world;

Alexander Roberts and W. H. Rambaut · ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1885

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

1. It is within the power of all, therefore, in every Church, who may wish to see the truth, to contemplate clearly the tradition of the apostles manifested throughout the whole world; and we are in a position to reckon up those who were by the apostles instituted bishops in the Churches, and [to demonstrate] the succession of these men to our own times; those who neither taught nor knew of anything like what these [heretics] rave about. For if the apostles had known hidden mysteries, which they were in the habit of imparting to “the perfect” apart and privily from the rest, they would have delivered them especially to those to whom they were also committing the Churches themselves. For they were desirous that these men should be very perfect and blameless in all things, whom also they were leaving behind as their successors, delivering up their own place of government to these men; which men, if they discharged their functions honestly, would be a great boon [to the Church], but if they should fall away, the direst calamity.

Do not overclaim

Read all of Against Heresies III.3, including its prominent appeal to Rome. Do not hide that passage or pretend that one English translation settles the later Orthodox–Roman Catholic debate about jurisdiction and infallibility.

Clarifying question

Where, according to Irenaeus, should apostolic teaching be sought: a secret lineage of ideas, or the public faith of the apostolic churches?

Sacraments and salvation · Patristic historical witness

Topic link

Grace, faith and a life of obedience

Objection: Does Orthodoxy teach that we earn salvation without grace?

Salvation is God’s gift, not an independent human achievement. Living faith is not permission to abandon love and obedience. Read Clement’s adjacent chapters together: chapter 32 rejects self-justification, and chapter 33 immediately calls believers to good works. Ephesians 2 likewise joins salvation by grace with creation in Christ for good works.

Evidence, distinctions and limits

Key distinction

Rejecting self-salvation is not rejecting obedience. Cooperation with grace does not make God indebted to us.

Scripture in context

Ephesians 2:8–10 · King James Version

8 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: [it is] the gift of God:

9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

Read the full Bible chapter

Patristic evidence

Saint Clement of Rome · First Epistle to the Corinthians
Chapter XXXII.—We are justified not...: Chapter XXXII.—We are justified not by our own works, but by faith.
And we, too, being called by His will in Christ Jesus, are not justified by ourselves, nor by our own wisdom, or understanding, or godliness, or works which we have wrought in holiness of heart; but by that faith through which, from the beginning, Almighty God has justified all men; to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson · ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1885

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

Whosoever will candidly consider each particular, will recognise the greatness of the gifts which were given by him. For from him have sprung the priests and all the Levites who minister at the altar of God. From him also [was descended] our Lord Jesus Christ according to the flesh. From him [arose] kings, princes, and rulers of the race of Judah. Nor are his other tribes in small glory, inasmuch as God had promised, “Thy seed shall be as the stars of heaven.” All these, therefore, were highly honoured, and made great, not for their own sake, or for their own works, or for the righteousness which they wrought, but through the operation of His will. And we, too, being called by His will in Christ Jesus, are not justified by ourselves, nor by our own wisdom, or understanding, or godliness, or works which we have wrought in holiness of heart; but by that faith through which, from the beginning, Almighty God has justified all men; to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Saint Clement of Rome · First Epistle to the Corinthians
Chapter XXXIII.—But let us not give...: Chapter XXXIII.—But let us not give up the practice of good works and love. God Himself is an example to us of good works.
What shall we do, then, brethren? Shall we become slothful in well-doing, and cease from the practice of love? God forbid that any such course should be followed by us!

Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson · ANF01. The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus · Historical English edition; series volume first published 1885

Read the full chapter

Read the complete source paragraph

What shall we do, then, brethren? Shall we become slothful in well-doing, and cease from the practice of love? God forbid that any such course should be followed by us! But rather let us hasten with all energy and readiness of mind to perform every good work. For the Creator and Lord of all Himself rejoices in His works. For by His infinitely great power He established the heavens, and by His incomprehensible wisdom He adorned them. He also divided the earth from the water which surrounds it, and fixed it upon the immoveable foundation of His own will. The animals also which are upon it He commanded by His own word into existence. So likewise, when He had formed the sea, and the living creatures which are in it, He enclosed them [within their proper bounds] by His own power. Above all, with His holy and undefiled hands He formed man, the most excellent [of His creatures], and truly great through the understanding given him— the express likeness of His own image. For thus says God: “Let us make man in Our image, and after Our likeness. So God made man; male and female He created them.” Having thus finished all these things, He approved them, and blessed them, and said, “Increase and multiply.” We see, then, how all righteous men have been adorned with good works, and how the Lord Himself, adorning Himself with His works, rejoiced. Having therefore such an example, let us without delay accede to His will, and let us work the work of righteousness with our whole strength.

Do not overclaim

First Clement is traditionally attributed to Clement of Rome; the letter speaks in the name of the Roman church. These chapters are early evidence, not a full adjudication of every later use of justification, merit or faith alone. Describe an opponent’s actual position rather than assuming all Protestants reject good works.

Clarifying question

Are works being treated as a claim upon God independent of grace, or as the fruit of a living response to His gift?

Using sources in discussion

  1. State the claim precisely and ask what kind of evidence would address it.
  2. Read the quotation, surrounding paragraph and full chapter. Do not omit a passage that complicates your argument.
  3. Identify the author, work, chapter and translation. A historical English wording is not the original Greek.
  4. Distinguish conciliar doctrine, received teaching, a Father’s argument and a private inference. One quotation does not establish the whole Church’s consensus.
  5. Correct an attribution or interpretation when the evidence requires it. Defend the faith without inventing facts or misrepresenting another person.

New Testament quotations use the King James Version. Bible edition and rights. Patristic edition details accompany each quotation; the full local readings include their rights information.